Prince Caspian
May 16th, 2008 by Bruce Edwards
Prince Caspian is the perfect summer movie for audiences that know nothing about Narnia, or, even, perhaps would prefer to know nothing about Narnia. For in its 2 hours and 40 minutes, you will spend ample time in Peter Jackson’s Middle Earth, William Wallace’s Scotland, Harry Potter’s Hogwarts, and maybe even fleeting moments in Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights, but you will not spend more than 15 minutes in the world that Aslan made and that C. S. Lewis invented.
Is that a bad thing? Not if your goal is to erase the basic tenets of the Narniad, and re-envision the realm as primarily grim internecine warfare, a land, 1300 years since we last visited, surprisingly full of crossbows and catapults and other Vader-like war machines. There is evil in this world, but its roots are fundamentally different from Lewis’s version, for in his book, the problem with Narnia is suppressed knowledge, a spiritual amnesia, a people separated from its own nature, a true prince denied his throne. Here viciousness and vice are simply personal ambition writ large—a common enough, even commonplace conflict. And enough to fill a screen with more deaths per frame than perhaps any other summer movie will provide.
The cineplexes will soon flow with blood, guts, action, adventure, mayhem, and CGI. And on that score, Prince Caspian will hold its own; it is at least twice as good as last summer’s Transformers, more technologically impressive than its predecessor, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and, certainly, filled with enough whimsy and valor (primarily in Peter Drinklage’s Trumpkin and Eddie Izzard’s Reepicheep) to please a wide range of moviegoers hungry for Shrek 4.
But, simply put, this is no more a movie about Narnia than Shadowlands was about C. S. Lewis and Joy Davidman. The opening titles suggest that it is “Based on the Book by C. S. Lewis,” and, in the sense that character and place names are derived from his original work, fair enough. But almost from the start the liberties taken from Lewis emerge that rob the dedicated, affectionate reader of The Chronicles of that familiar sense of belonging, that “inconsolable longing” that suggests “the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have not visited.” These moviemakers know movies; they don’t know, perhaps have never been to, Narnia. And it shows. For this particular scent we know only too well, this tune we hum constantly, and this country is all too overbooked.
Please don’t mistake these comments as mere rant, seeping from another wounded, disappointed apologist looking for spiritual pegs on which to hang his allegorical garments. Atmosphere is everything to Lewis: it’s what makes a countryside, a sunrise, a waterfall, a poem, a book, worth viewing, worth inhabiting. Prince Caspian, the book, is awash in nature, of boisterous Bacchanalian grandeur and joy—and thereby we are drawn in, captivated, enchanted, incarnate. Adamson has a glass eye and tin ear for such subtleties. This is epic movie making, not nuanced scene-setting; the closest the movie comes to it is near the end when the trees clasp their hands and the river rises up to restore order and balance in Narnia. More of this, sir, and less of the rest.
Anyone making this sequel would face the unenviable task of following perhaps the most beloved book of all those that Lewis wrote: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. It is a hard act to follow both theologically and, perhaps, cinematically, for is there anything that happens in Prince Caspian as momentous and as personally moving as confronting the raw evil of an oppressed Narnia, the anticipation of Aslan’s arrival, the climactic spiritual warfare between him and Queen Jadis, followed by his resurrection and the renewal of Narnia? The Fall, the Sacrifice, the Redemption, the Reign. How can that be topped? It can’t.
But it can be extended and branched out by gathering a new cast of characters placed in circumstances equally perilous and challenging. What would happen if Narnians forgot who Aslan is? What if they became oblivious to their history and the true story of their redemption? Lewis knew this theme well, for it described his own experience of the modern world, a world awash in its own self-afflicted amnesia. And thus he wrote a much different sort of story to bridge them and us onto the Narnian future, bringing the Pevensies back in a rather ingenious time-displacement story told simultaneously retrospectively (through Trumpkin’s account of Dr. Cornelius’ mentorship over Caspian) and prospectively (through his familiar narrator’s wistful voice).
Prince Caspian, thus, is about what happens next, what happens when the mystique and the mystery of life has been stripped away or treated contemptuously—about what happens when Aslan’s true nature and the Pevensie’s righteous reign are discarded or buried or ignored. A movie made of such poignant substance could be transcendent, lyrical, mythical, could be a wondrous standalone tale in itself—as the forgotten kings and queens of Narnia return not a moment too soon to help the noble but naive Prince Caspian learn his destiny and help true Narnians recover their birthright. Regrettably, that is not the movie Andrew Adamson and his crew have chosen to make.
Prince Caspian is meant as an indigenous story, a story that begs to be told by, for, and through the inhabitants on other side of the wardrobe, er, railway. Unfortunately and inexplicably, this script relentlessly mistrusts Lewis’s narrative emphasis on character development and the role of honor and integrity and substitutes mere battle armor, a mindless proliferation of arrows and blades. With the lavish attention to state of the art CGI, it may seem perverse for me to say that the movie lacks imagination. It is, in its failures, too literal.
This is a movie that not only downplays exposition—absent are explanations of why and how Caspian must be tutored by Dr. Cornelius, why Nikabrik may doubt the existence of Aslan and choose to cavort with hags and werewolfs who can reanimate a dead Queen Jadis, why the Pevensies would long to see the hide-and-seek, reluctantly heroic, passive-aggressive Aslan again in the first place—it seems to depise it. An outsider to the Narnian universe must wonder, if not from the beginning, in various junctures, why this is all happening, in this order, for these reasons: all resulting in confusion, creating head-scratching puzzlement over what exactly it means to be a Narnian, and why it would be honorable to fight for its heritage against these evil Telmarines.
Aslan’s deployment here is quite perfunctory, and essentially reduced to a rather cynical cameo; while Narnians are dying heroically, he is roaming the woods, awaiting Lucy’s arrival to remind her of how brave she is. He shows up at the movie’s climactic scene not so much to save the day (it is too late for that), but to demonstrate his power over nature, soliciting the question, where were you in reel one?
The item that I object to most in this screenplay is transferral of the temptation to conjure up the White Witch to Caspian and Peter—not something that Lewis would have approved; it fits neither their character nor the flow of the plot. It barely explains why even the world-weary dwarf, Nikabrik, whose faith has been shattered, would be so inclined, so desperate. Whence comes his rage and doubt? Lewis provides that motivation and in the book’s most poignant scene, uses Nikabrik’s own comrades to explain why his twisted logic would bring further ruin upon Narnia.
In the end, too much battle left this Narnian admirer and Lewis lover fatigued and bad-tempered. Some very good actors, including those playing the Pevensies, are not given much to do. More’s the pity. We can only hope that Michael Apted, the director named to oversee The Voyage of the “Dawn Treader” will be more respectful of the Narnian worldview and provide the franchise some spiritual depth, and moral courage. At least we have more of Reepicheep to look forward to; let’s hope his personality does not morph into his lesser second cousin twice-removed, Mickey.
6 Comments »
6 Responses to “Prince Caspian”
digg this!
It will probably be a fun video game?
As one who loves Narnia so deeply, I knew that no movie could ever achieve the unenviable task of living up to what I know in the book — but I had hoped this movie would fall less short than it did.
This movie made me sad in the “lost potential” kind of way. It looked good, had good actors, and moments of humor — but it’s hard to laugh too deeply when the soul of the movie is missing. I was waiting, I had great anticipation for Aslan’s role, and to see the characters react to their challenges, betrayals, temptations, to being humbled, to forgiveness. Instead we got a stock bad guy hulking around building a bridge for half the movie.
I was prepared to forgive a lot of the (arbitrary?) changes to the book so long as I saw the characters I know represented, so long as I saw Peter’s initial arrogance humbled, Lucy’s devotion and dedication rewarded (more than this creepy lion who just sits around waiting for her and then goes “oh well, I guess I can help.” They made Aslan seem like some random dude who occasionally cares —- instead of making it be about those that had “spiritual amnesia” as you say.
But as I looked and longed and waited, my disappointment grew. GIve this movie to Guillermo del Toro, or Terry Gilliam. We don’t need any more Shrek movies.
Prince Caspian met my expectations, which weren’t extremely high in the first place. I had the most tremendous feeling of ‘loss-of-potential’ when I saw the very first film in theaters. Andrew Adamson, I immediately recognized, is a special-effects guru, and not much more. He is not exactly a story-teller, at least, he doesn’t know how to make things interesting without “gee-wow!” pictures. He is a visual artist, effectively conveying a great wealth of detail and thoughtfulness in a purely visual fashion (Think Thomas Kinkade?). But he lacks the ability Kinkade’s compatriot, James Gurney, demonstrated so well with his well-regarded visual storybook, Dinotopia. This is ability is, pure and simple, the ability to imbue and/or bring out personality in that which he is able to create with such vivid visuals.
So, in this regard, I was not disappointed with the film. I knew Adamson would create a sugary visual masterpiece that was largely void of the necessary protein provided by character development.
The fellow who played Prince Caspian (Ben Barnes) struck me as a young actor who surely has the ability, but who was given nothing, apparently, to go on as far as his character is concerned.
Two moments in the film really moved me. When Lucy actually goes to Aslan, and when Trumpkin finally sees Him. These were incredible moments in the book, and perhaps it is because I have such fond memories of them, going back to my childhood, that I felt they were effective. My only cries of distress came when they cut the scene with Trumpkin and Alsan off with “Now, do you see him!?” and then when Caspian and Susan kissed. The love interest was more than a bit annoying from the get-go, and then the kiss just made me want to hurl a brick through the screen.
On the whole, I enjoyed the movie for what it was: glucose-loaded fantasy that still retained enough important smidgens of the Narnia I know and love to be effective, and especially palatable for little kids. Oh, and Reepicheep was pretty awesome.
My expectations will not be forgiving at all with Dawn Treader. It is one of my favorites of the series (I’ll admit, Caspian is one of my least favorite). Here’s hoping that the Narnia films follow the trend of the Harry Potter films in making enough money with the first two to allow the third and fourth and so on to be edgier and involve a great deal more character development, as opposed to sheer visual magnificence.
Who should do The Silver Chair? Vadim Perelman? Tom Tykwer? Michael Winterbottom?
The first one was better!
There were disappointments and lackings in spiritual opportunities, and I felt the ones they did let out were kind of in your face, awkward – not following the “fluff” of the rest of the movie. In general, there was a lack of depth to the plot and even the characters – it felt like a meshing of 300 with Prince Caspian’s people, and yes I felt the Shrek 4 vibe grossly.
Nonetheless, I did enjoy the spiritual jolts and the movie enough. A good thing for me is that I didn’t realize or it didn’t feel that long (2:40). Reepicheep was fun, even though it was randomly thrown in at the end for Lucy to give him the drop of life potion.
All in all, glad to catch it as an early summer excitement, and there hasn’t been much to speak of for at least 6 months in my opinion in the cinema world!
Now onto Indiana Jones…..I’m afraid it will let down – aliens mentioned to be in it?!?
I found this film empty if you’re looking for Narnia, and full if you’re looking for a decent kids Lord of the Rings rip.
My favorite part?
Edmund. The kid kicked major ass. Sorry but that’s the only way to put it. I look forward to seeing him in other things besides Narnia.
Dinklage and Izzard were fun as mentioned. I also thought Peter’s acting has improved drastically, and if Edmund didn’t overshadow him he would have felt even cooler. Didn’t care for the white witch temptation, that was BS – no way Pete would ever for a second stand there that weak. Caspian made sense, he didn’t know what it was. Pete knew better.
Which is why I’m sure someone went in and spiked Edmund’s character and let him snap Pete out of it. He spent the whole movie snapping Pete out of it. He was so awesome non-stop the entire time, for what, a 12 year old? Nice work kid.
I don’t have much else to add. I am agreed.
Well, you finally gave me a reason to watch it again someday. i did like Edmund, the acting and the contribution to the rescue of Peter’s character. He’s even better in the book!
Don’t know if you ever saw my own very disappointed blog entry here: http://tinyurl.com/9ayz28 – and yet I live with some hope for Voyage of the Dawn Treader because Michael Apted, who directed the fine Amazing Grace is set to direct it, along with a new writer…
But perhaps I’m just a fool…